The SAML XML.org web site is not longer accepting new posts. Information on this page is preserved for legacy purposes only. For current information on SAML, please see the OASIS Security Services Technical Committee Wiki.

Diff for Extension to RequestAbstractType

Tue, 2009-06-02 23:22 by blinkTue, 2009-06-02 23:23 by blink
next diff >
Changes to Body
Line 3Line 3
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
I am currently working on my Master thesis, where I am editing a SAML 2.0 implementation (simpleSAMLphp, but it's not relevant to the question, I think) and making an extension. To achieve my goals, I need to pass an Assertion containing an Authn Statement from one IdP (where the user authenticated himself) to another. I think the way to do ths is using the defined &quot;Extensions&quot; field from &quot;RequestAbstractType&quot;. While reading the Specification, I noticed it mentions that the Namespace of those extensions must be different than that of SAML 2.0.So my question is, can I just insert my Assertion as an &quot;extra-parameter&quot;, inside an Extension, or must I somewhow change the namespace?
+
I am currently working on my Master thesis, where I am editing a SAML 2.0 implementation (simpleSAMLphp, but it's not relevant to the question, I think) and making an extension. To achieve my goals, I need to pass an Assertion containing an Authn Statement from one IdP (where the user authenticated himself) to another. I think the way to do this is using the defined &quot;Extensions&quot; field from &quot;RequestAbstractType&quot;. While reading the Specification, I noticed it mentions that the Namespace of those extensions must be different from that of SAML 2.0.So my question is, can I just insert my Assertion as an &quot;extra-parameter&quot;, inside an Extension, or must I somewhow change the namespace?
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 9Line 9
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
 (...)
+
(...)
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 15Line 15
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
        &lt;saml:Assertion&gt;
+
&lt;saml:Assertion&gt;
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
                  (...)
+
(...)
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
         &lt;/saml:Assertion&gt;
+
&lt;/saml:Assertion&gt;
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
-
 &lt;/samlp:Extensions&gt;
+
&lt;/samlp:Extensions&gt;
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Revision of Tue, 2009-06-02 23:23:

Extension to RequestAbstractType

Hello there!

I am currently working on my Master thesis, where I am editing a SAML 2.0 implementation (simpleSAMLphp, but it's not relevant to the question, I think) and making an extension. To achieve my goals, I need to pass an Assertion containing an Authn Statement from one IdP (where the user authenticated himself) to another. I think the way to do this is using the defined "Extensions" field from "RequestAbstractType". While reading the Specification, I noticed it mentions that the Namespace of those extensions must be different from that of SAML 2.0.So my question is, can I just insert my Assertion as an "extra-parameter", inside an Extension, or must I somewhow change the namespace?

In either case, could it be something as simple as:

(...)

<samlp:Extensions>

<saml:Assertion>

(...)

</saml:Assertion>

</samlp:Extensions>

 

Thanks in advance for the help!

Daniel Gomes

‹ Attribute Query and bindings SecurityDomain attribute on NameIdentifier tag in SAML 1.1 ›
XML.org Focus Areas: BPEL | DITA | ebXML | IDtrust | OpenDocument | SAML | UBL | UDDI
OASIS sites: OASIS | Cover Pages | XML.org | AMQP | CGM Open | eGov | Emergency | IDtrust | LegalXML | Open CSA | OSLC | WS-I

Hosted by:

OASIS